Though the Mamiya 7II is certainly bigger than a 35mm rangefinder, it is approximately the same size as a pro SLR like the Nikon F5 or EOS 1VS. To put this in perspective, that is actually less than an MP with a noctilux or just a few grams more than the MP with the 75mm summilux or a 90mm APO ASPH. It weighs in at 2.6lbs with the 80mm lens. Despite the giant negative, the camera remains rather small and light. The Mamiya 7II is a 6x7cm rangefinder camera with top-notch optics, a great finder and AE operation. It does not really have the grace and refinement of its Leica mother, but it has her eyes.
Mamiya 7 ii photos crack#
Now imagine if that Leica smoked a bunch of crack and had a baby with a Mamiya RZ67 – the child would be the Mamiya 7II. Live and learn.Īnyway, here are a few more shots from the Mamiya 7ii + 43mm lens (I didnt bring viewfinder for 43mm lens as I find its not really necessary).Imagine if you will, a mild-mannered Leica M7. Wide lenses have a tendency to “squish” and area into a small frame, so even large alpine like mountains, look like little hills. Though I think had I brough my 150mm lens I would have gotten a lot more quality shots – as it was, I think its hard to capture the “vastness” of an area with such a wide lens that I brought. In the end I think the extra weight and effort was worth it. I did have a tripod, which I used both for video and for photography, my tripod weighed about 400grams and gives about 150cm of height. This seemed to work really well as I didnt have fog or moisture in my camera at all despite several days of hard rain. To protect my camera I kept it in a Wandrd camera cube, in a plastic ziploc bag, the bag filled with these gel packs that keep moisture out. This choice was mainly due to weight, one lens was enough. Though, I do regret not bringing my 150mm lens for the Mamiya, as 43mm is arguably to wide for most landscape applications. WIth its built in meter, super sharp lenses and lightweight, it was a no brainer. However, while debating whether to bring my Ricoh GR21, Nikon F5, Canon f-1 or Mamiya 7ii, I ended on the only choice that would make any sense: the Mamiya 7ii. I normally dont need more than a 40 liter backpack, however, with the mamiya and a packing cube I would need a 70 liter pack. It was the volume of my pack that bothered me. While 14kg would not kill me, and I knew after a few days of eating the food weight in my backpack, my kit would be under 10 kg in no time. In fact, just before boarding the train to northern sweden, I was still changing out my different pre-packed cameras and camera cubes in my backpack. It really was an internal debate for weeks whether or not I would bring the camera and what camera for that matter. While my total backpacking gear weight with food for the entire trip came in at 11kg, with the camera that pushed everything to just shy of 14kg. Though, because I am a lightweight backpacking nerd, its hard to justify 2 kilos of extra gear that can only take still photos. On this particular trip I wanted to bring my analog camera as it had been years since I actually went hiking with an analog camera. I never went total digital as I always preferred the look of analog. All film processed myself at home.Īs some of you might know from previous post I have been an avid analog photographer (hobby) forever. The film I used for this trip was varied but mainly Fuji Velvia 100 and Portra 160, 400.
This isnt going to be a post about the hike itself, but rather about my choice to bring the Mamiya 7ii +43mm lens and a ton of film. Starting at Ritsem and walking along the Padjelantaleden then moving off to Nordkalottleden and finishing in Kvikkjokk. A friend and I recently took a 7 day, 165 kilometer walk in Northern Sweden.